Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

'What did I say?' versus 'What did I think?' : attributing false beliefs to self amongst children with and without autism.

Williams, D. M. and Happe, F. (2009) ''What did I say?' versus 'What did I think?' : attributing false beliefs to self amongst children with and without autism.', Journal of autism and developmental disorders., 39 (6). pp. 865-873.

Abstract

The task used most widely to assess recognition of false belief in self and others is the 'Smarties' unexpected contents task. Amongst individuals with and without autism, the Self and Other-person test questions of this task are of an equivalent level of difficulty. However, a potential confound with this task may allow the Self test question to be passed without false belief competence. Three groups of participants (with autism, developmental disability and typical development) undertook a new unexpected contents task which did not suffer from this confound. The main finding was that participants with autism performed significantly less well on the Self test question than the Other-person test question on this new task. Individuals with autism may have greater difficulty representing their own beliefs than the beliefs of other people.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Autism spectrum disorder, Theory of mind, False belief, Unexpected contents task, Self-awareness.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0695-6
Record Created:08 Nov 2012 14:20
Last Modified:14 Nov 2012 14:59

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library