Manley, A. and Palmer, C. and Roderick, M. (2012) 'Disciplinary power, the oligopticon and rhizomatic surveillance in elite sports academies.', Surveillance & society., 10 (3/4). pp. 303-319.
This article aims to apply a post-panoptic view of surveillance within the context of elite sport. Latour’s (2005) ‘oligopticon’ and Deleuze and Guttari’s (2003) ‘rhizomatic’ notion of surveillance networks are adopted to question the relevance and significance of Foucault’s (1979) conceptualisation of surveillance within an elite sports academy setting. A contemporary representation of bio-politics (Rose 1999, 2001) is further utilised to discern the mode of governance and control effective within such institutions. In so doing, this article seeks to understand the evolving methods of surveillance technology and governance and how they are situated within the setting of a contemporary institution. Such considerations aim to provoke a line of questioning surrounding the normalisation of intrusive surveillance practices and their impact upon identity construction and an authentic sense of self.
|Keywords:||Surveillance, Academies, Oligopticon.|
|Full text:||(VoR) Version of Record|
Download PDF (280Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://library.queensu.ca/ojs/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/sports|
|Publisher statement:||© The author(s), 2012 | Licensed to the Surveillance Studies Network under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives license.|
|Date accepted:||No date available|
|Date deposited:||22 February 2013|
|Date of first online publication:||2012|
|Date first made open access:||No date available|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|