We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Disciplinary power, the oligopticon and rhizomatic surveillance in elite sports academies.

Manley, A. and Palmer, C. and Roderick, M. (2012) 'Disciplinary power, the oligopticon and rhizomatic surveillance in elite sports academies.', Surveillance & society., 10 (3/4). pp. 303-319.


This article aims to apply a post-panoptic view of surveillance within the context of elite sport. Latour’s (2005) ‘oligopticon’ and Deleuze and Guttari’s (2003) ‘rhizomatic’ notion of surveillance networks are adopted to question the relevance and significance of Foucault’s (1979) conceptualisation of surveillance within an elite sports academy setting. A contemporary representation of bio-politics (Rose 1999, 2001) is further utilised to discern the mode of governance and control effective within such institutions. In so doing, this article seeks to understand the evolving methods of surveillance technology and governance and how they are situated within the setting of a contemporary institution. Such considerations aim to provoke a line of questioning surrounding the normalisation of intrusive surveillance practices and their impact upon identity construction and an authentic sense of self.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Surveillance, Academies, Oligopticon.
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:© The author(s), 2012 | Licensed to the Surveillance Studies Network under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives license.
Date accepted:No date available
Date deposited:22 February 2013
Date of first online publication:2012
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar