Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Alfred Verdross and the contemporary constitutionalization debate.

O'Donoghue, Aoife (2012) 'Alfred Verdross and the contemporary constitutionalization debate.', Oxford journal of legal studies., 32 (4). pp. 799-822.

Abstract

Within international law Verdross is an influential figure. Verdross' examinations of international community, jus cogens and multilateralism are particularly significant and it is from his exploration of these elements of international law that his insights on international constitutionalization emerged. His impact can be felt in the contemporary constitutionalization debate. His influence on the debate is evident, to varying degrees, in the work of several international legal scholars such as Mosler, Tomuschat, Simma, De Wet, Peters and Fassbender. Verdrossian international constitutional theory has become dominant within the various constitutionalization theories that have emerged, particularly those that centre upon jus cogens, international community and multilateralism although arguably it is the theories that rely on core norms within the international legal order which owe the most to Verdross and his nascent development of international constitutionalization.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Verdross, Constitutionalization, Jus cogens, International community, Constitutionalism.
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(337Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqs022
Publisher statement:This is a pre-copy-editing author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version O'Donoghue, Aoife (2012) 'Alfred Verdross and the contemporary constitutionalization debate.', Oxford journal of legal studies., 32 (4). pp. 799-822 is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqs022
Record Created:15 Mar 2013 12:20
Last Modified:12 Oct 2014 00:30

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library