Professor Peter Vickers peter.vickers@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Scientific Theory Eliminativism
Vickers, P.
Authors
Abstract
The philosopher of science faces overwhelming disagreement in the literature on the definition, nature, structure, ontology, and content of scientific theories. These disagreements are at least partly responsible for disagreements in many of the debates in the discipline which put weight on the concept *scientific theory*. I argue that available theories of theories and conceptual analyses of *theory* are ineffectual options for addressing this difficulty: they do not move debates forward in a significant way. Directing my attention to debates about the properties of particular, named theories, I introduce ‘theory eliminativism’ as a certain type of debate-reformulation. As a methodological tool it has the potential to be a highly effective way to make progress in the face of the noted problem: post-reformulation disagreements about *theory* cannot compromise the debate, and the questions that really matter can still be asked and answered. In addition the reformulation process demands that philosophers engage with science and the history of science in a more serious way than is usual in order to answer important questions about the justification for targeting a particular set of propositions (say) in a given context. All things considered, we should expect the benefits of a theory-eliminating debate-reformulation to heavily outweigh the costs for a highly significant number of debates of the relevant type.
Citation
Vickers, P. (2014). Scientific Theory Eliminativism. Erkenntnis, 79(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9471-2
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 2, 2013 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 11, 2013 |
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Mar 19, 2013 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 28, 2024 |
Journal | Erkenntnis |
Print ISSN | 0165-0106 |
Electronic ISSN | 1572-8420 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 79 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 111-126 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9471-2 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(324 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9471-2.
You might also like
The Call for a New Definition of Biosignature.
(2023)
Journal Article
Don’t we all believe in scientific facts? Replies to my critics
(2023)
Journal Article
Breakthrough results in astrobiology: is ‘high risk’ research needed?
(2023)
Journal Article
Confidence of Life Detection: The Problem of Unconceived Alternatives
(2023)
Journal Article
Knowledge of the Quantum Domain: an Overlap Strategy
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search