We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Governing climate change : the politics of risk society?

Bulkeley, H. (2001) 'Governing climate change : the politics of risk society?', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers., 26 (4). pp. 430-447.


This paper examines how the politics of climate change have taken shape within Australia through the construction and contestation of concepts of obligation and responsibility. Beck's risk society thesis offers a conceptual starting point from which to address questions concerning the nature of contemporary risk politics, and the paper examines its relevance and applicability in this case. While Beck's theory provides insight into the nature of risk and directs attention to the ways in which notions of obligation and responsibility structure risk politics, it fails to engage with why, and how, particular definitions of risk and responsibility come to dominate the political arena. It is argued that in Australia the novel challenges climate change poses to the institutions of modernity have been negated through ensuing policy responses which have reinforced links between industry and government, and have defined climate responsibilities within existing relations of production and the spatio-temporal frameworks of modernity.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Published on behalf of the Royal Geographical Society (with The Institute of British Geographers).
Keywords:Risk politics, Obligation, Responsibility, Industry, Government, Australia.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:
Record Created:07 Nov 2006
Last Modified:08 Apr 2009 16:24

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library