Brooks, Thom (2011) 'Is Bradley a retributivist ?', History of political thought., 32 (1). pp. 83-95.
Perhaps the least controversial area of F.H. Bradley's writings relates to his views on punishment. Commentators universally recognize Bradley's theory of punishment as a retributivist theory of punishment. This article challenges the received wisdom. I argue that Bradley does not endorse retributivism as commonly understood. Instead, he defends the view that punishment is non-retributivist and serves the end of societal maintenance. Moreover, Bradley defends this view consistently from Ethical Studies to later work on punishment. Instead of holding a theory of punishment largely unique amongst British Idealists of his time, Bradley's views on punishment are far more consistent than previously thought.
|Keywords:||Punishment, Retribution, Unified theory.|
|Full text:||(VoR) Version of Record|
Download PDF (89Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/hpt/2011/00000032/00000001/art00005|
|Publisher statement:||Copyright © Imprint Academic 2011|
|Record Created:||01 May 2013 12:50|
|Last Modified:||05 Jan 2014 00:30|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|