L. da Costa
Talking methods in achievement goal research
da Costa, L.; Remedios, R.
Authors
R. Remedios
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a sense of methodological unrest in the field of achievement goal research, a prominent theory of achievement motivation. In particular, the predominant use of questionnaires in measuring students’ achievement goals has come under closer scrutiny. Potential methodological weaknesses have included researcher-imposed development and measurement of achievement goal constructs, respondents’ masked misunderstanding of questionnaire items, and a continued potential for demand characteristics. It has been suggested that some of these possible methodological weaknesses can be addressed using interview methods. This paper explores the extent to which using interviews may be able to overcome the challenges posed by questionnaires for measuring students’ goals for studying.
Citation
da Costa, L., & Remedios, R. (2012). Talking methods in achievement goal research. Education Section review - British Psychological Society, 36(2), 9-16
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2012 |
Deposit Date | Apr 3, 2013 |
Journal | The Psychology of education review : the journal of the Education Section of the British Psychological Society. |
Print ISSN | 0262-4087 |
Publisher | The British Psychological Society |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 36 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 9-16 |
Keywords | Achievement motivation, Goal theory, Questionnaires, Interviews, Social cognition. |
Publisher URL | http://www.bpsshop.org.uk/The-Psychology-of-Education-Review-Vol-36-No-2-Autumn-2012-P2589.aspx |
You might also like
Learning with Smartphones: Students' Lived Experience of using Smartphones
(2013)
Conference Proceeding
Year 7 Pupils' Views of the Future
(2011)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search