Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Coalition culls and zoonotic ontologies.

Atkins, P.J. and Robinson, P.A. (2013) 'Coalition culls and zoonotic ontologies.', Environment and planning A., 45 (6). pp. 1372-1386.

Abstract

Diseases which can pass between animals and humans (zoonoses) have been headline news several times in the last ten years. This paper looks at bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in the United Kingdom, which, although not a major health hazard for humans, has been problematic for farmers and the veterinary health institutions. At its current rate of spread, the disease will cost the authorities £1 billion in compensation to farmers for slaughtered animals and in administrative expenses over the next decade. The present Coalition government is planning to cull badgers in England because they are the principal wildlife reservoir of bTB and are said to pass infection to cattle. We argue in five stories that the heterogeneities of bTB help explain the difficulties in dealing with it. In our opinion, the present reductive set of policies would be improved by taking this ontological multiplicity into account.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Badgers, Bovine tuberculosis, Zoonoses, Ontology.
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(386Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a45668
Publisher statement:P.J. Atkins and P.A. Robinson 2013. The definitive peer-reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Environment and Planning A, 45(6) pp. 1372-1386, 2013, 10.1068/a45668
Record Created:14 Aug 2013 13:05
Last Modified:05 Jan 2014 00:30

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library