Dickins, T. and Barton, R.A. (2013) 'Reciprocal causation and the proximate-ultimate distinction.', Biology & philosophy., 28 (5). pp. 747-756.
Laland and colleagues have sought to challenge the proximate–ultimate distinction claiming that it imposes a unidirectional model of causation, is limited in its capacity to account for complex biological phenomena, and hinders progress in biology. In this article the core of their argument is critically analyzed. It is claimed that contrary to their claims Laland et al. rely upon the proximate–ultimate distinction to make their points and that their alternative conception of reciprocal causation refers to phenomena that were already accounted for by standard theory.
|Keywords:||Proximate cause, Ultimate cause, Reciprocal causation.|
|Full text:||Full text not available from this repository.|
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9345-z|
|Record Created:||10 Feb 2014 15:50|
|Last Modified:||18 Feb 2014 14:25|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|