We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Chaos and control : nanotechnology and the politics of emergence.

Kearnes, M. B. (2006) 'Chaos and control : nanotechnology and the politics of emergence.', Paragraph., 29 (2). pp. 57-80.


This article looks at the strong links between Deleuze's molecular ontology and the fields of complexity and emergence, and argues that Deleuze's work implies a ‘philosophy of technology’ that is both open and dynamic. Following Simondon and von Uexküll, Deleuze suggests that technical objects are ontologically unstable, and are produced by processes of individuation and self-organization in complex relations with their environment. For Deleuze design is not imposed from without, but emerges from within matter. The fundamental departure for Deleuze, on the basis of such an ontology, is to conceive of modes of relating to the evolution of technology. In this way Deleuze, along with Guattari, provides the basis for an ethics and a politics of becoming and emergent control that constitutes an alternative to the hubris of contemporary reductionist accounts of new areas such as nanotechnology.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Special issue: Deleuze and Science edited by John Marks.
Keywords:Nanotechnology, Emergence, Reductionism, Evolution, Deleuze.
Full text:(SMUR) Submitted Manuscript Under Review
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Record Created:10 Apr 2008
Last Modified:31 Jul 2015 14:18

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library