Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Metal specificity of cyanobacterial nickel-responsive repressor InrS: cells maintain zinc and copper below the detection threshold for InrS

Foster, A.W.; Pernil, R.; Patterson, C.J.; Robinson, N.J.

Metal specificity of cyanobacterial nickel-responsive repressor InrS: cells maintain zinc and copper below the detection threshold for InrS Thumbnail


Authors

A.W. Foster

R. Pernil

C.J. Patterson



Abstract

InrS is a Ni(II)-responsive, CsoR/RcnR-like, DNA-binding transcriptional repressor of the nrsD gene, but the Ni(II) co-ordination sphere of InrS is unlike Ni(II)-RcnR. We show that copper and Zn(II) also bind tightly to InrS and in vitro these ions also impair InrS binding to the nrsD operator-promoter. InrS does not respond to Zn(II) (or copper) in vivo after 48 h, when Zn(II) sensor ZiaR responds, but InrS transiently responds (1 h) to both metals. InrS conserves only one (of two) second co-ordination shell residues of CsoR (Glu98 in InrS). The allosteric mechanism of InrS is distinct from Cu(I)-CsoR and conservation of deduced second shell residues better predicts metal specificity than do the metal ligands. The allosteric mechanism of InrS permits greater promiscuity in vitro than CsoR. The factors dictating metal-selectivity in vivo are that KNi(II) and ΔGCNi(II)-InrS·DNA are sufficiently high, relative to other metal sensors, for InrS to detect Ni(II), while the equivalent parameters for copper may be insufficient for copper-sensing in Synechocystis (at 48 h). InrS KZn(II) (5.6 × 10−13 M) is comparable to the sensory sites of ZiaR (and Zur), but ΔGCZn(II)-InrS·DNA is less than ΔGCZn(II)-ZiaR·DNA implying that relative to other sensors, ΔGCZn(II)-Sensor·DNA rather than KZn(II) determines the final detection threshold for Zn(II).

Citation

Foster, A., Pernil, R., Patterson, C., & Robinson, N. (2014). Metal specificity of cyanobacterial nickel-responsive repressor InrS: cells maintain zinc and copper below the detection threshold for InrS. Molecular Microbiology, 92(4), 797-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12594

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 24, 2014
Online Publication Date Apr 14, 2014
Publication Date May 1, 2014
Deposit Date May 20, 2014
Publicly Available Date Jun 2, 2014
Journal Molecular Microbiology
Print ISSN 0950-382X
Electronic ISSN 1365-2958
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 92
Issue 4
Pages 797-812
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12594

Files

Published Journal Article (5.1 Mb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© 2014 The Authors. Molecular Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations