Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Non-reductive physicalism and the problem of strong closure

Gibb, S.C.

Authors



Abstract

Closure is the central premise in one of the best arguments for physicalism—the argument from causal overdetermination. According to Closure, at every time at which a physical event has a sufficient cause, it has a sufficient physical cause. This principle is standardly defended by appealing to the fact that it enjoys empirical support from numerous confirming cases (and no disconfirming cases) in physics. However, in recent literature on mental causation, attempts have been made to provide a stronger argument for it. This essay argues that, insofar as these attempts are successful, they actually establish a far stronger closure principle. Worryingly, the acceptance of this stronger principle presents a new problem for the most popular form of physicalism, that of nonreductive physicalism. The problem shall be referred to as the 'Problem of Strong Closure.'

Citation

Gibb, S. (2012). Non-reductive physicalism and the problem of strong closure. American Philosophical Quarterly, 49(1), 29-42

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 2012
Deposit Date Jun 2, 2010
Journal American Philosophical Quarterly
Print ISSN 0003-0481
Electronic ISSN 2152-1123
Publisher University of Illinois Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 49
Issue 1
Pages 29-42
Publisher URL http://apq.press.illinois.edu/49/1/gibb.html


You might also like



Downloadable Citations