Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

DF's visual brain in action: the role of tactile cues

Whitwell, R.L.; Milner, A.D.; Cavina-Pratesi, C.; Byrne, C.M.; Goodale, M.A.

DF's visual brain in action: the role of tactile cues Thumbnail


Authors

R.L. Whitwell

A.D. Milner

C. Cavina-Pratesi

C.M. Byrne

M.A. Goodale



Abstract

Patient DF, an extensively-tested woman with visual form agnosia from ventral-stream damage, is able to scale her grip aperture to match a goal object's geometry when reaching out to pick it up, despite being unable to explicitly distinguish amongst objects on the basis of their different geometries. Using evidence from a range of sources, including functional MRI, we have proposed that she does this through a functionally intact visuomotor system housed within the dorsal stream of the posterior parietal lobe. More recently, however, Schenk (2012a). The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(6), 2013–2017; Schenk (2012b). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 258–259. has argued that DF performs well in visually guided grasping, not through spared and functioning visuomotor networks in the dorsal stream, but because haptic feedback about the locations of the edges of the target is available to calibrate her grasps in such tasks, whereas it is not available in standard visual perceptual tasks. We have tested this 'calibration hypothesis' directly, by presenting DF with a grasping task in which the visible width of a target varied from trial to trial while its actual width remained the same. According to the calibration hypothesis, because haptic feedback was completely uninformative, DF should be unable to calibrate her grip aperture in this task. Contrary to this prediction, we found that DF continued to scale her grip aperture to the visual width of the targets and did so well within the range of healthy controls. We also found that DF's inability to distinguish shapes perceptually is not improved by providing haptic feedback. These findings strengthen the notion that DF’s spared visuomotor abilities are driven largely by visual feedforward processing of the geometric properties of the target. Crucially, these findings also indicate that simple tactile contact with an object is needed for the visuomotor dorsal stream to be engaged, and accordingly enables DF to execute visually guided grasping successfully. This need for actions to have a tangible endpoint provides an important new modification of the Two Visual Systems theory.

Citation

Whitwell, R., Milner, A., Cavina-Pratesi, C., Byrne, C., & Goodale, M. (2014). DF's visual brain in action: the role of tactile cues. Neuropsychologia, 55, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.019

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 20, 2013
Online Publication Date Dec 1, 2013
Publication Date Mar 1, 2014
Deposit Date Sep 24, 2014
Publicly Available Date Sep 26, 2014
Journal Neuropsychologia
Print ISSN 0028-3932
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 55
Pages 41-50
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.019
Keywords DF, Perception, Action, Grasping, Dorsal stream, Ventral stream.

Files

Accepted Journal Article (611 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Neuropsychologia. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Neuropsychologia, 55, 2014, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.019.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations