Google's Anti-competitive and Unfair Practices in Digital Leisure Markets

Chirita, Anca Daniela

Google's Anti-competitive and Unfair Practices in Digital Leisure Markets

Chirita, Anca Daniela

Authors

Dr Anca Chirita a.d.chirita@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to reflect on the critical use of commitments in the Google case and to analyse and review the matrix of facts that have been highlighted in the academic and practitioner literature. Therefore, the core areas of reflection in this contribution are: relevant markets; barriers to entry; network and lock-in effects; dominance; and, potential anticompetitive, as well as unfair practices as regards commercial advertisements. The analysis of the online search-engine market is complemented by the comparative insights offered by the US class action against Google’s Android mobile applications. In the EU, a similar trend is noticeable in the complaining tone of Google’s competitors. When this is coupled with the transitional period of the mandate of the newly appointed Commissioner for Competition and the political sensitivity over the potential to misuse search-engine users’ personal data to serve commercial purposes, such as boosting its advertising revenues, the giant Google swims in uncertain waters.

Citation

Chirita, A. D. (2015). Google's Anti-competitive and Unfair Practices in Digital Leisure Markets. Competition law review, 11(1), 109-131

Journal Article Type	Article
Acceptance Date	May 1, 2015
Online Publication Date	Jul 1, 2015
Publication Date	Jul 1, 2015
Deposit Date	Jun 23, 2014
Publicly Available Date	Oct 21, 2014
Journal	Competition Law Review
Publisher	Competition Law Scholars Forum (CLaSF)
Peer Reviewed	Peer Reviewed
Volume	11
Issue	1
Pages	109-131
Publisher URL	http://clasf.org/browse-the-complrev/
Related Public URLs	http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/files/program-xxiii-clasf-madrid.pdf