Martin Gelter
Citations to Foreign Courts – Illegitimate and Superfluous, or Unavoidable? Evidence from Europe
Gelter, Martin; Siems, Mathias
Authors
Mathias Siems
Abstract
The theoretical arguments in favor and against citations to foreign courts have reached a high degree of sophistication. Yet, this debate is often based on merely anecdotal assumptions as to their actual purpose. This Article aims to fill this gap in the literature. It offers quantitative evidence from ten European supreme courts in order to assess the desirability of such cross-citations. In addition, it examines individual cases qualitatively, developing a taxonomy of cross-citations based on the degree to which courts engage with foreign law. The Article highlights the often superficial nature of cross-citations in some courts. Yet, by and large, our analysis supports the use of cross-citations: it does not have the pernicious effects sometimes suggested by critics, such as undercutting national sovereignty or the legitimacy of the legal system. At best, cross-citations provide a source of inspiration to interpret national law. At worst, they are largely ornamental and of marginal help to make a particular policy argument more persuasive.
Citation
Gelter, M., & Siems, M. (2014). Citations to Foreign Courts – Illegitimate and Superfluous, or Unavoidable? Evidence from Europe. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 62(1), 35-85. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2013.0012
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 10, 2013 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 1, 2014 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2014 |
Deposit Date | May 20, 2014 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 5, 2016 |
Journal | American Journal of Comparative Law |
Print ISSN | 0002-919X |
Publisher | American Society of Comparative Law |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 62 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 35-85 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2013.0012 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(545 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in American journal of comparative law following peer review. The version of record Gelter, Martin and Siems, Mathias (2014) 'Citations to foreign courts – illegitimate and superfluous, or unavoidable? Evidence from Europe.', American journal of comparative law., 62 (1). pp. 35-85 is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2013.0012
You might also like
Foreign-trained legal scholars in the UK: ‘irritants’ or ‘change agents’?
(2021)
Journal Article
The Power of Comparative Law: What Types of Units Can Comparative Law Compare?
(2019)
Journal Article
The law and ethics of ‘cultural appropriation’
(2019)
Journal Article
The Illusion of Motion: Corporate (Im)Mobility and the Failed Promise of Centros
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search