Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

A proposal for judging the trustworthiness of research findings.

Gorard, S. (2014) 'A proposal for judging the trustworthiness of research findings.', Radical statistics., 110 . pp. 47-59.

Abstract

This paper offers a procedure for, and a description of the elements involved in judging how trustworthy a research finding is. The idea is of value to the users of research evidence and to researchers themselves when creating a synthesis of existing evidence (i.e. in a literature review. The focus here is on active designs to address causal research questions, but the ideas can easily be extended to other types of research. Other than design, the elements suggested are sample size and quality, data quality, fidelity of intervention, and threats to validity. These are combined in a kind of ‘sieve’ to produce a judgement-based star-rating for the believability of a piece of research. Trustworthiness of research findings is currently an area with too little focus for the development of new researchers.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
(401Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://www.radstats.org.uk/journal/journalissue110/
Record Created:13 Nov 2014 09:35
Last Modified:13 Nov 2014 16:18

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library