Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research.

Banks, Sarah and Armstrong, Andrea and Carter, Kathleen and Graham, Helen and Hayward, Peter and Henry, Alex and Holland, Tessa and Holmes, Claire and Lee, Amelia and McNulty, Ann and Moore, Niamh and Nayling, Nigel and Stokoe, Ann and Strachan, Aileen (2013) 'Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research.', Contemporary social science., 8 (3). pp. 263-277.

Abstract

This article explores a range of ethical issues that arise in community-based participatory research (CBPR), drawing on literature and examples from practice. The experience of CBPR practitioners adds further weight to the growing critique by many other social researchers of regulatory approaches to research ethics (which focus on rule following in accordance with research governance frameworks, codes of conduct and ethics review procedures). Yet, whilst many of the ethical challenges in CBPR are common to social research generally (informed consent, anonymity, issues of ownership of data and findings), the dynamic, complex and value-based nature of CBPR gives them particular prominence. There are also specific issues relating to the ethics of partnership working, collaboration, blurring of boundaries between researchers and researched, community rights, community conflict and democratic participation that are more frequently encountered in CBPR. Four practice examples are used to demonstrate this argument. These are taken from a young women's community allotment, a community organisation researching poverty, a youth peer research project and a museum-based digital storytelling project. The article concludes that current institutional ethical codes, guidelines and ethical review procedures are not particularly well-suited to CBPR, in that they adopt principle-based and regulatory approaches to ethics; whereas character- and relationship-based approaches to ethics are also very important in CBPR, which is adopted by many researchers with a strong value commitment to social justice.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Special Issue: Knowledge Mobilisation and the Social Sciences: Research Impact and Engagement.
Keywords:Community-based participatory research, Ethics, Institutional review, Ethical guidelines.
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution.
Download PDF
(166Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2013.769618
Publisher statement:© 2013 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. Permission is granted subject to the terms of the License under which the work was published. Please check the License conditions for the work which you wish to reuse. Full and appropriate attribution must be given. This permission does not cover any third party copyrighted material which may appear in the work requested.
Record Created:20 Nov 2014 11:20
Last Modified:09 Mar 2018 11:48

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library