Heymans, C. and Van Waerbeke, L. and Bacon, D. and Berge, J. and Bernstein, G. and Bertin, E. and Bridle, S. and Brown, M.L. and Clowe, D. and Dahle, H. and Erben, T. and Gray, M. and Hetterscheidt, M. and Hoekstra, H. and Hudelot, P. and Jarvis, M. and Kuijken, K. and Margoniner, V. and Massey, R. and Mellier, Y. and Nakajima, R. and Refregier, A. and Rhodes, J. and Schrabback, T. and Wittman, D. (2006) 'The Shear Testing Programme - I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations.', Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society., 368 (3). pp. 1323-1339.
The Shear Testing Programme (STEP) is a collaborative project to improve the accuracy and reliability of all weak lensing measurements in preparation for the next generation of wide-field surveys. In this first STEP paper, we present the results of a blind analysis of simulated ground-based observations of relatively simple galaxy morphologies. The most successful methods are shown to achieve percent level accuracy. From the cosmic shear pipelines that have been used to constrain cosmology, we find weak lensing shear measured to an accuracy that is within the statistical errors of current weak lensing analyses, with shear measurements accurate to better than 7 per cent. The dominant source of measurement error is shown to arise from calibration uncertainties where the measured shear is over or underestimated by a constant multiplicative factor. This is of concern as calibration errors cannot be detected through standard diagnostic tests. The measured calibration errors appear to result from stellar contamination, false object detection, the shear measurement method itself, selection bias and/or the use of biased weights. Additive systematics (false detections of shear) resulting from residual point-spread function anisotropy are, in most cases, reduced to below an equivalent shear of 0.001, an order of magnitude below cosmic shear distortions on the scales probed by current surveys. Our results provide a snapshot view of the accuracy of current ground-based weak lensing methods and a benchmark upon which we can improve. To this end we provide descriptions of each method tested and include details of the eight different implementations of the commonly used Kaiser, Squires & Broadhurst method (KSB+) to aid the improvement of future KSB+ analyses.
|Keywords:||Gravitational lensing, Cosmology: observations, Large-scale structure of Universe.|
|Full text:||(VoR) Version of Record|
Download PDF (407Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x|
|Publisher statement:||This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2006 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.|
|Record Created:||29 Jan 2015 13:20|
|Last Modified:||16 Feb 2015 11:28|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|