Matthew Duncombe
Irreflexivity and Aristotle's Syllogismos
Duncombe, Matthew
Authors
Abstract
Aristotle's definition of syllogismos at Prior Analytics 24b18–20 specifies syllogistic consequence as an irreflexive relation: the conclusion must be different from each premise and any conjunction of the premises. Typically, commentators explain this irreflexivity condition as Aristotle's attempt to brand question-begging syllogismoi illegitimate in argumentative contexts. However, this explanation faces two problems. First, it fails to consider all the contexts in which Aristotle thinks syllogismoi are deployed. Secondly, irreflexivity rules out only some arguments that Aristotle considers question begging. Here I address these problems. First, I examine all the contexts in which Aristotle thinks syllogismoi can be used. Secondly, I argue that, for each context, irreflexivity makes sense as a condition, but for different reasons. Assuming that a condition which holds in each context is a condition on syllogistic consequence tout court, this explains why Aristotle holds syllogistic consequence to be an irreflexive relation.
Citation
Duncombe, M. (2014). Irreflexivity and Aristotle's Syllogismos. Philosophical Quarterly, 64(256), 434-452. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu016
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jul 1, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Feb 24, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 31, 2016 |
Journal | Philosophical Quarterly |
Print ISSN | 0031-8094 |
Electronic ISSN | 1467-9213 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 64 |
Issue | 256 |
Pages | 434-452 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu016 |
Keywords | Aristotle, Syllogism, Logic, Consequence, Prior Analytics, Question begging. |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(433 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in The Philosophical Quarterly following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Duncombe, Matthew (2014) 'Irreflexivity and Aristotle's syllogismos.', The Philosophical Quarterly, 64 (256): 434-452 is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu016.
You might also like
Thought as Internal Speech in Plato and Aristotle
(2016)
Journal Article
Dialectic and logic in Aristotle and his tradition
(2016)
Journal Article
Aristotle’s two accounts of relatives in Categories 7
(2015)
Journal Article
The Role of Relatives in Plato's Partition Argument, Republic 4, 436B 9-439 C 9
(2015)
Book Chapter
The Greatest Difficulty at Parmenides 133 C–134 E and Plato's Relative Terms
(2013)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search