We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Bible and Church, Bultmann and Augustine : a response to David Congdon.

Moberly, R.W.L. (2015) 'Bible and Church, Bultmann and Augustine : a response to David Congdon.', Journal of theological interpretation., 9 (1). pp. 39-48.


I respond here to Congdon’s 2014 response to my 2012 essay on Bultmann and Augustine. I argue that although Congdon offers a useful account of Bultmann’s theology and ecclesiology on its own terms, he does not sufficiently relate this to the question of the relationship between biblical interpretation, ecclesiology and the social nature of knowledge, which I find to be well articulated by Augustine. I critique Bultmann’s application of justification by faith alone to epistemology, which seems to underlie his reticence about the possible epistemological significance of ecclesiology. And I suggest that Bultmann’s programme for theological interpretation, although it has enduring depth and challenge, is nonetheless significantly limited as a resource for contemporary theological interpretation.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Bultmann, Augustine, Ecclesiology, Presuppositions, Demythologizing, Plausibility structure, Social nature of knowledge, Biblical truth.
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Record Created:27 May 2015 11:50
Last Modified:28 May 2015 09:32

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library