Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Lamotrigine versus inert placebo in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation

Crawford, M.J.; Sanatinia, R.; Barret, B.; Byford, S.; Cunningham, G.; Gakhal, K.; Lawrence-Smith, G.; Leeson, V.; Lemonsky, F.; Lykomitrou, G.; Montgomery, A.; Morriss, R.; Paton, C.; Tan, W.; Tyrer, P.; Reilly, J.G.

Lamotrigine versus inert placebo in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation Thumbnail


Authors

M.J. Crawford

R. Sanatinia

B. Barret

S. Byford

G. Cunningham

K. Gakhal

G. Lawrence-Smith

V. Leeson

F. Lemonsky

G. Lykomitrou

A. Montgomery

R. Morriss

C. Paton

W. Tan

P. Tyrer

J.G. Reilly



Abstract

Background: People with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience rapid and distressing changes in mood, poor social functioning and have high rates of suicidal behaviour. Several small scale studies suggest that mood stabilizers may produce short-term reductions in symptoms of BPD, but have not been large enough to fully examine clinical and cost-effectiveness. Methods/Design: A two parallel-arm, placebo controlled randomized trial of usual care plus either lamotrigine or an inert placebo for people aged over 18 who are using mental health services and meet diagnostic criteria for BPD. We will exclude people with comorbid bipolar affective disorder or psychosis, those already taking a mood stabilizer, those who speak insufficient English to complete the baseline assessment and women who are pregnant or contemplating becoming pregnant. Those meeting inclusion criteria and provide written informed consent will be randomized to up to 200mg of lamotrigine per day or an inert placebo (up to 400mg if taking combined oral contraceptives).Participants will be randomized via a remote web-based system using permuted stacked blocks stratified by study centre, severity of personality disorder, and level of bipolarity. Follow-up assessments will be conducted by masked researchers 12, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks after randomization. The primary outcome is the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD). The secondary outcomes are depressive symptoms, deliberate self-harm, social functioning, health-related quality of life, resource use and costs, side effects of treatment, adverse events and withdrawal of trial medication due to adverse effects. The main analyses will use intention to treat without imputation of missing data. The economic evaluation will take an NHS/Personal Social Services perspective. A cost-utility analysis will compare differences in total costs and differences in quality of life using QALYs derived from the EQ-5D. Discussion: The evidence base for the use of pharmacological treatments for people with borderline personality disorder is poor. In this trial we will examine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of lamotrigine to assess what if any impact offering this has on peoples’ mental health, social functioning, and use of other medication and other resources. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN90916365 (registered 01/08/2012)

Citation

Crawford, M., Sanatinia, R., Barret, B., Byford, S., Cunningham, G., Gakhal, K., …Reilly, J. (2015). Lamotrigine versus inert placebo in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation. Trials, 16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0823-x

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 26, 2015
Publication Date Jul 18, 2015
Deposit Date Jul 21, 2015
Publicly Available Date Aug 25, 2015
Journal Trials
Publisher BioMed Central
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0823-x
Keywords Borderline personality disorder, Mood stabilizer, Lamotrigine, Randomized trial.

Files

Published Journal Article (795 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
© 2015 Crawford et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations