Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Socio-economic rights during economic crises : a changed approach to non-retrogression.

Warwick, Ben T.C. (2016) 'Socio-economic rights during economic crises : a changed approach to non-retrogression.', International and comparative law quarterly., 65 (01). pp. 249-265.

Abstract

When the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) released a letter in early 2012 addressing the financial and economic crises, it was long overdue. Finally, and around four and a half years after the crises began, the body responsible for monitoring those rights that had been most severely impacted had spoken. But what had been said? This article examines the alterations to the doctrine of non-retrogression that the 2012 Letter instigated. It does so by reference to the ‘Business as Usual’ and ‘accommodation’ theories of emergency response. The Letter to States is argued to have taken the Committee away from an approach to non-retrogression that treated times of normality and emergency in a similar way, and towards an approach that allows derogation-style deviations from the Covenant. This, it is argued, could have detrimental effects for the protection of economic and social rights. The difficulties in applying such an approach are considered.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Derogation, Economic and social rights, Economic crisis, Emergency, Enforcement, Limitation, Retrogression, UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(247Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020589315000494
Publisher statement:Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2016. This paper has been published in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press, in 'International and Comparative Law Quarterly' (65: 01 (2016) 249-265) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ILQ
Record Created:28 Oct 2015 14:50
Last Modified:15 Jan 2016 11:32

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library