Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

The myth of 'scientific method' in contemporary educational research.

Aiston, S. J. and Rowbottom, D. P. (2006) 'The myth of 'scientific method' in contemporary educational research.', Journal of philosophy of education., 40 (2). pp. 137-156.

Abstract

Whether educational research should employ the `scientific method' has been a recurring issue in its history. Hence, textbooks on research methods continue to perpetuate the idea that research students ought to choose between competing camps: `positivist' or `interpretivist'. In reference to one of the most widely referred to educational research methods textbooks on the market—namely Research Methods in Education by Cohen, Manion, and Morrison—this paper demonstrates (1) the misconception of science in operation and (2) the perversely false dichotomy that has become enshrined in educational research. It then advocates a new approach, and suggests that the fixation with `science' versus `non-science' is counterproductive, when what is actually required for good inquiry is a critical approach to knowledge claims.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00508.x
Record Created:07 Jul 2008
Last Modified:24 May 2012 12:23

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library