Roberts, R. and Gott, R. (2006) 'Assessment of performance in practical science and pupil attributes.', Assessment in education., 13 (1). pp. 45-67.
Performance assessment in the UK science General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) currently relies on pupil reports of their investigations. These are widely criticized. Written tests of procedural understanding could be used as an alternative, but what exactly do they measure? This paper describes small-scale research in which there was an analysis of assessments of pupils' GCSE scores of substantive ideas, their coursework performance assessment and a novel written evidence test. Results from these different assessments were compared with each other and with baseline data on CAT scores and pupils' attributes. Significant predictors of performance on each of these assessments were determined. The data reported shows that a choice could be made between practical coursework that links to ‘behaviour’ and written evidence tests which link, albeit less strongly, with ‘quickness’. There would be differential effects on pupils.
|Full text:||Full text not available from this repository.|
|Publisher Web site:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09695940600563652|
|Record Created:||10 Jan 2007|
|Last Modified:||27 Apr 2016 09:49|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Usage statistics||Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|