Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Assessment of performance in practical science and pupil attributes.

Roberts, R. and Gott, R. (2006) 'Assessment of performance in practical science and pupil attributes.', Assessment in education., 13 (1). pp. 45-67.

Abstract

Performance assessment in the UK science General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) currently relies on pupil reports of their investigations. These are widely criticized. Written tests of procedural understanding could be used as an alternative, but what exactly do they measure? This paper describes small-scale research in which there was an analysis of assessments of pupils' GCSE scores of substantive ideas, their coursework performance assessment and a novel written evidence test. Results from these different assessments were compared with each other and with baseline data on CAT scores and pupils' attributes. Significant predictors of performance on each of these assessments were determined. The data reported shows that a choice could be made between practical coursework that links to ‘behaviour’ and written evidence tests which link, albeit less strongly, with ‘quickness’. There would be differential effects on pupils.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:
Keywords:Procedural understanding.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09695940600563652
Record Created:10 Jan 2007
Last Modified:08 Apr 2009 16:26

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library