Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey

Rose, P.; Rubin, G.; Perera-Salazar, R.; Almberg, S.S.; Barisic, A.; Dawes, M.; Grunfeld, E.; Hart, N.; Neal, R.D.; Pirotta, M.; Sisler, J.; Konrad, G.; Toftegaard, B.S.; Thulesius, H.; Vedsted, P.; Young, J.; Hamilton, W.; Group, The ICBP Module 3 Working

Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey Thumbnail


Authors

P. Rose

G. Rubin

R. Perera-Salazar

S.S. Almberg

A. Barisic

M. Dawes

E. Grunfeld

N. Hart

R.D. Neal

M. Pirotta

J. Sisler

G. Konrad

B.S. Toftegaard

H. Thulesius

P. Vedsted

J. Young

W. Hamilton

The ICBP Module 3 Working Group



Abstract

Objectives The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) is a collaboration between 6 countries and 12 jurisdictions with similar primary care-led health services. This study investigates primary care physician (PCP) behaviour and systems that may contribute to the timeliness of investigating for cancer and subsequently, international survival differences. Design A validated survey administered to PCPs via the internet set out in two parts: direct questions on primary care structure and practice relating to cancer diagnosis, and clinical vignettes, assessing management of scenarios relating to the diagnosis of lung, colorectal or ovarian cancer. Participants 2795 PCPs in 11 jurisdictions: New South Wales and Victoria (Australia), British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario (Canada), England, Northern Ireland, Wales (UK), Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Primary and secondary outcome measures Analysis compared the cumulative proportion of PCPs in each jurisdiction opting to investigate or refer at each phase for each vignette with 1-year survival, and conditional 5-year survival rates for the relevant cancer and jurisdiction. Logistic regression was used to explore whether PCP characteristics or system differences in each jurisdiction affected the readiness to investigate. Results 4 of 5 vignettes showed a statistically significant correlation (p<0.05 or better) between readiness to investigate or refer to secondary care at the first phase of each vignette and cancer survival rates for that jurisdiction. No consistent associations were found between readiness to investigate and selected PCP demographics, practice or health system variables. Conclusions We demonstrate a correlation between the readiness of PCPs to investigate symptoms indicative of cancer and cancer survival rates, one of the first possible explanations for the variation in cancer survival between ICBP countries. No specific health system features consistently explained these findings. Some jurisdictions may consider lowering thresholds for PCPs to investigate for cancer—either directly, or by specialist referral, to improve outcomes.

Citation

Rose, P., Rubin, G., Perera-Salazar, R., Almberg, S., Barisic, A., Dawes, M., …Group, T. I. M. 3. W. (2015). Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey. BMJ Open, 5(5), Article e007212. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007212

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 12, 2015
Publication Date May 27, 2015
Deposit Date Jan 26, 2016
Publicly Available Date Jan 27, 2016
Journal BMJ Open
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 5
Issue 5
Article Number e007212
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007212

Files

Published Journal Article (2.4 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/




You might also like



Downloadable Citations