J. Katzav
The future of climate modeling
Katzav, J.; Parker, W.S.
Authors
W.S. Parker
Abstract
Recently a number of scientists have proposed substantial changes to the practice of climate modeling, though they disagree over what those changes should be. We provide an overview and critical examination of three leading proposals: the unified approach, the hierarchy approach and the pluralist approach. The unified approach calls for an accelerated development of high-resolution models within a seamless prediction framework. The hierarchy approach calls for more attention to the development and systematic study of hierarchies of related models, with the aim of advancing understanding. The pluralist approach calls for greater diversity in modeling efforts, including, on some of its variants, more attention to empirical modeling. After identifying some of the scientific and institutional challenges faced by these proposals, we consider their expected gains and costs, relative to a business-as-usual modeling scenario. We find the proposals to be complementary, having valuable synergies. But since resource limitations make it unlikely that all three will be pursued, we offer some reflections on more limited changes in climate modeling that seem well within reach and that can be expected to yield substantial benefits.
Citation
Katzav, J., & Parker, W. (2015). The future of climate modeling. Climatic Change, 132(4), 475-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1435-x
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 17, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 18, 2015 |
Publication Date | Oct 1, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Nov 5, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 29, 2016 |
Journal | Climatic Change |
Print ISSN | 0165-0009 |
Electronic ISSN | 1573-1480 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 132 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 475-487 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1435-x |
Files
Published Journal Article
(211 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
You might also like
Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View
(2020)
Journal Article
Evidence and Knowledge from Computer Simulation
(2020)
Journal Article
Philosophical Perspectives on Earth System Modeling: Truth, Adequacy, and Understanding
(2020)
Journal Article
Incorporating user values into climate services
(2019)
Journal Article
Issues in the Theoretical Foundations of Climate Science
(2018)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search