Brooks, Thom (2016) 'Vote buying and tax cut promises.', Theoria., 63 (146). pp. 20-35.
Both vote buying and tax-cut promises are attempts to manipulate voters through cash incentives in order to win elections, but only vote buying is illegal. Should we extend the ban on vote buying to tax-cut promises? This article will argue for three conclusions. The first is that tax-cut promises should be understood as a form of vote buying. The second is that campaign promises are a form of vote buying. The third conclusion is that campaign promises, including tax-cut promises, should not be banned. An important distinction is drawn between enforceable wrongful incentives and unenforceable wrongful incentives. The difference between vote buying and tax-cut promises is not wrongfulness but enforceability.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (221Kb)
|Full text:||Publisher-imposed embargo |
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
File format - PDF (Revised version) (209Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2015.6314602|
|Publisher statement:||This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedited version of an article published in Theoria. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Brooks, Thom (2016). Vote Buying and Tax Cut Promises. Theoria 63(146): 20-35 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2015.6314602|
|Record Created:||17 Feb 2016 13:05|
|Last Modified:||06 Jun 2017 12:02|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|