Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

David Ingersoll, behavioralism and the modern revival of legal realism.

Brooks, Thom (2015) 'David Ingersoll, behavioralism and the modern revival of legal realism.', Beijing law review., 6 (3). pp. 190-192.

Abstract

David Ingersoll’s essay “Karl Llewellyn, American Legal Realism and Contemporary Legal Behavioralism” is a significant, but neglected contribution to our understanding of legal realism in the United States. This article argues that it first anticipates the shape of legal realism’s revival today and shows that Ingersoll was ahead of his time. The once dominant school of legal realism had become a much maligned theory of law when this essay was first published. Ingersoll identifies two varieties of legal realism and most critics focus on only one of them. He argues that legal realism should be revived if it develops its second variety often overlooked which accepts rule skepticism and recognizes the importance of social psychology to predicting legal outcomes more reliably.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution.
Download PDF
(594Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution.
Download PDF
(185Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/blr.2015.63018
Publisher statement:Copyright © 2015 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Record Created:20 Jun 2016 14:20
Last Modified:20 Jun 2016 14:27

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library