Layton, R. and Rowley-Conwy, P. (2013) 'Wild things in the north? Hunter-gatherers and the tyranny of the colonial perspective.', Anthropologie: international journal of human diversity and evolution., 51 (2). pp. 213-230.
The paper argues for a synthesis of Darwinian and Marxist theories of evolution. We challenge claims that hunter-gatherer societies evolve via a natural progression from simple to complex, arguing instead that huntergatherer social strategies are adaptations to specifiable ecological conditions, while having emergent consequences that shape the political structure of hunter-gatherer society. We review the various theories of which we make use, and those that we challenge, and test them against data from the ethnographic and archaeological literature on hunter-gatherers, discussing the evidence for variation in technology, mobility, territoriality and egalitarianism versus social inequality. We conclude that human societies do not evolve via a natural progression from simple to complex forms, and that complex hunter-gatherers are not necessarily incipient farmers. Many of the assumptions that colour common views of the development of hunter-gatherer complexity and the appearance of agriculture in prehistoric Europe have their roots, consciously or unconsciously, in nineteenth-century European colonialism.
|Additional Information:||Special Issue: Theory and method in the prehistoric archaeology of Central Europe.|
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (470Kb)
|Full text:||(VoR) Version of Record|
Download PDF (526Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||http://puvodni.mzm.cz/Anthropologie/article.php?ID=1515|
|Record Created:||20 Jul 2016 16:05|
|Last Modified:||07 Jun 2018 10:37|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|