Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Written evidence to the Scrutiny of the Government's Supply Estimates. Parliament's Procedure Committee.

Ferry, L. (2016) 'Written evidence to the Scrutiny of the Government's Supply Estimates. Parliament's Procedure Committee.', Documentation. House of Commons Select Committee, London.

Abstract

I welcome this opportunity to submit written evidence to the Procedure Committee’s inquiry on Scrutiny of the Government’s Supply Estimates. This reply draws on my recent published academic work on budgeting and governance in public services and senior level personal experience of both central government and local government accounting practices. My response takes account of that there has already been written evidence submitted to this inquiry on comparative contexts (Wehner), international best practice (OECD) and pragmatic improvements (Heald). I do not aim to repeat these messages per se, and instead focus more specifically on one main theme and derive a number of points accordingly.

Item Type:Monograph (Documentation)
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(103Kb)
Status:Not peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/procedure-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/government-spending-15-16/publications/
Publisher statement:This document is made available under an Open Government Licence - http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
Record Created:28 Jul 2016 10:35
Last Modified:05 Jan 2017 10:32

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library