Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials.

Cartwright, N. and Deaton, A. (2016) 'Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials.', Working Paper. Centre for Humanities Engaging Science and Society (CHESS), Durham.

Abstract

What allows research evidence to contribute to successful social policy and improve practice in public services? The establishment of the What Works Network, a group of evidence ‘clearing houses’, that summarise academic research evidence for practitioners in different policy areas, heralds a resurgence of evidence-based approaches in British policymaking. This report outlines the existing literature analysing the process of implementing evidence-informed policy, with a particular focus on the field of primary and secondary education. New data, based on interviews with teachers in primary and secondary schools, along with the analysis of existing literature, suggest that understanding the rationale for a particular policy approach and recognising relevant contextual factors are crucial for selecting and implementing successful policies. This suggests that local knowledge, as well as professional judgement and expertise, are critical contributors to policymaking alongside formal scientific research evidence.

Item Type:Monograph (Working Paper)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
(974Kb)
Status:Public
Publisher Web site:https://www.dur.ac.uk/chess/chessworkingpapers/
Record Created:07 Oct 2016 16:50
Last Modified:13 Oct 2016 12:17

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library