Aoife O’Donoghue
A Path Already Travelled in Domestic Orders? From Fragmentation to Constitutionalisation in the Global Legal Order
O’Donoghue, Aoife; Murray, Colin
Authors
Colin Murray
Abstract
Theories of fragmentation and constitutionalisation have long been presented as antagonistic accounts of the global legal order. Fragmentation theorists posit a non-hierarchical order explained in terms of the relationships between general and specialised areas of international law. Constitutionalisation’s adherents, by contrast, identify the global legal order’s ongoing transformation from horizontal and consent-based roots towards a hierarchal structure grounded upon fundamental principles. The proliferation of international tribunals has long been recognised as a factor muddying the picture of constitutionalisation and pointing towards fragmentation within international law. We argue, however, that this proliferation enhances the global order’s potential for constitutionalisation. The current state of fragmentation within the uncodified global order is comparable to long periods when the UK’s uncodified constitution exhibited the hallmarks of fragmented development. We bridge these supposedly rival explanations for the development of legal orders by re-evaluating the role played by competing courts in the UK’s constitutionalisation process, reassessing developments familiar to common-law historians through the prism of fragmentation theory. The UK example indicates that fragmentation is not, of itself, an insurmountable obstacle to constitutionalisation within the global order and may even mark a stage within this process. We employ lessons derived from this comparison to evaluate current flashpoints in relations between international tribunals, including the European Court of Justice’s Opinion 2/13 which has for now stymied the EU’s efforts to accede to the European Convention on Human Rights.
Citation
O’Donoghue, A., & Murray, C. (2017). A Path Already Travelled in Domestic Orders? From Fragmentation to Constitutionalisation in the Global Legal Order. International Journal of Law in Context, 13(3), 225-252. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552317000064
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 10, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 24, 2017 |
Publication Date | Apr 24, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Nov 15, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 29, 2024 |
Journal | International Journal of Law in Context |
Print ISSN | 1744-5523 |
Electronic ISSN | 1744-5531 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 225-252 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552317000064 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(612 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This article has been published in a revised form in International journal of law in context https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Cambridge University Press 2017
You might also like
Syria & Locating Tyranny, Hegemony and Anarchy in Contemporary International Law
(2020)
Journal Article
Life after Brexit: Operationalising the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement’s Principle of Consent
(2019)
Journal Article
"Ourworld": A Feminist Approach to Global Constitutionalism
(2019)
Journal Article
Can Global Constitutionalism be Feminist?
(2019)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search