Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Why Do We Do What We Do? Comparing Legal Methods in Five Law Schools through Survey Evidence

Siems, Mathias; Mac Sithigh, Daithi

Why Do We Do What We Do? Comparing Legal Methods in Five Law Schools through Survey Evidence Thumbnail


Authors

Mathias Siems

Daithi Mac Sithigh



Contributors

Rob van Gestel
Editor

Hans Micklitz
Editor

Edward L. Rubin
Editor

Abstract

For the purpose of this paper we conducted an empirical survey of academic staff at two German law schools (Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf; Bucerius Law School), two UK ones (University of East Anglia; University of Edinburgh) and one Irish one (Trinity College, Dublin). We asked the legal scholars to indicate to what extent they identify with legal research as part of humanities, as part of social sciences, and as akin to the analysis of law in legal practice. In this paper we present and discuss our results, using tools of both classical and compositional statistics. We also relate our data to contextual information about these legal scholars (e.g., training, career stage) as well as institutional and country differences. Our main general finding is that scholars of the German law schools have a relatively strong preference for practical legal research and scholars of the UK and Irish law schools a relatively strong preference for law as humanities. Some of our specific findings are that international legal scholars tend to be closer to the social sciences and that younger scholars and private lawyers tend to be closer to practical legal research. We also observe some signs of convergence since, across the five law schools, scholars told us that they tend to use practical legal research methods less often, and social sciences methods more often, than ten years ago.

Citation

Siems, M., & Mac Sithigh, D. (2017). Why Do We Do What We Do? Comparing Legal Methods in Five Law Schools through Survey Evidence. In R. van Gestel, H. Micklitz, & E. L. Rubin (Eds.), Rethinking legal scholarship: a transatlantic interchange (31-83). Cambridge University Press

Online Publication Date Feb 1, 2017
Publication Date Feb 1, 2017
Deposit Date Feb 2, 2017
Publicly Available Date Mar 29, 2024
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Pages 31-83
Book Title Rethinking legal scholarship: a transatlantic interchange.
Publisher URL http://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/law/jurisprudence/rethinking-legal-scholarship-transatlantic-dialogue?format=HB&isbn=9781107130920
Related Public URLs https://ssrn.com/abstract=2625473

Files

Accepted Book Chapter (669 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This material has been published in Rethinking legal scholarship: a transatlantic interchange edited by Rob van Gestel, Hans Micklitz and Edward L. Rubin. This version is free to view and download for personal use only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Rob van Gestel, Hans-W. Micklitz and Edward L. Rubin 2017





You might also like



Downloadable Citations