We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

Assembly mounds in the Danelaw : place-name and archaeological evidence in the historic landscape.

Skinner, A. T. and Semple, S. (2015) 'Assembly mounds in the Danelaw : place-name and archaeological evidence in the historic landscape.', Journal of the North Atlantic., 8 (sp8). pp. 115-133.


The mound as a focus for early medieval assembly is found widely throughout Northern Europe in the first millennium AD. Some have argued such features are evidence of early practices situated around places of ancestral importance, others that an elite need for legitimate power drove such adoptions. Elsewhere evidence for purpose-built mounds suggests they were intrinsic to the staging of events at an assembly and could be manufactured if needed. This paper builds on the results presented in the Ph.D. thesis of the first author. Here we take up the issue of meeting mounds, focusing on their role as sites of assembly in the Danelaw. This region of northern and eastern England was first documented in the early 11th century as an area subject to conquest and colonization from Scandinavia in the 9th century and beyond. The county of Yorkshire forms a case study within which we explore the use of the mound for assembly purposes, the types of monuments selected, the origins of these monuments and the activity at them, and finally the possible Scandinavian influences on assembly practices in the region.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Volume 8 Special Volume 8: Debating the Thing in the North II: Selected Papers from Workshops Organized by the Assembly Project
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Download PDF
Publisher Web site:
Publisher statement:Any further replication or distribution of the article, either in whole or in part, except for personal research purposes, is not allowed except with the written permission of the publisher, the Eagle Hill Institute.
Date accepted:01 January 2015
Date deposited:22 February 2017
Date of first online publication:01 April 2015
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Look up in GoogleScholar