Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies.

Johnston, R.J. and Boyle, K.J. and Adamowicz, W. and Bennett, J. and Brouwer, R. and Cameron, T.A. and Hanemann, W.M. and Hanley, N. and Scarpa, R. and Tourangeau, R. and Vossler, C.A. (2017) 'Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies.', Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists., 4 (2). pp. 319-405.

Abstract

This article proposes contemporary best-practice recommendations for stated preference (SP) studies used to inform decision making, grounded in the accumulated body of peer-reviewed literature. These recommendations consider the use of SP methods to estimate both use and non-use (passive-use) values, and cover the broad SP domain, including contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. We focus on applications to public goods in the context of the environment and human health but also consider ways in which the proposed recommendations might apply to other common areas of application. The recommendations recognize that SP results may be used and reused (benefit transfers) by governmental agencies and nongovernmental organizations, and that all such applications must be considered. The intended result is a set of guidelines for SP studies that is more comprehensive than that of the original National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on contingent valuation, is more germane to contemporary applications, and reflects the two decades of research since that time. We also distinguish between practices for which accumulated research is sufficient to support recommendations and those for which greater uncertainty remains. The goal of this article is to raise the quality of SP studies used to support decision making and promote research that will further enhance the practice of these studies worldwide.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Publisher-imposed embargo until 29 March 2018.
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
First Live Deposit - 23 March 2017
File format - PDF
(660Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1086/691697
Publisher statement:© 2017 by The Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. All rights reserved.
Record Created:23 Mar 2017 09:59
Last Modified:05 Apr 2017 11:31

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library