Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Dating Palaeolithic cave art: why U-Th is the way to go

Pike, A.; Hoffmann, D.; Pettitt, P.; García-Diez, M.; Zilhão, J.

Dating Palaeolithic cave art: why U-Th is the way to go Thumbnail


Authors

A. Pike

D. Hoffmann

M. García-Diez

J. Zilhão



Abstract

The chronology of European Upper Palaeolithic cave art is poorly known. Three chronometric techniques are commonly applicable: AMS 14C, TL and U–Th, and in recent years the efficacy of each has been the subject of considerable debate. We review here the use of the U–Th technique to date the formation of calcites that can be shown to have stratigraphic relationships to cave art. We focus particularly on two recent critiques of the method. By using specific examples from our own work using this method in Spain, we demonstrate how these critiques are highly flawed and hence misleading, and we argue that the U–Th dating of calcites is currently the most reliable of available chronometric techniques for dating cave art.

Citation

Pike, A., Hoffmann, D., Pettitt, P., García-Diez, M., & Zilhão, J. (2016). Dating Palaeolithic cave art: why U-Th is the way to go. Quaternary International, 432(B), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.013

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Feb 9, 2016
Publication Date Feb 9, 2016
Deposit Date Feb 21, 2017
Publicly Available Date Mar 28, 2024
Journal Quaternary International
Print ISSN 1040-6182
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 432
Issue B
Pages 41-49
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.013
Related Public URLs http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/387132/

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations