Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

What evidence should guidelines take note of?

Cartwright, N. (2018) 'What evidence should guidelines take note of?', Journal of evaluation in clinical practice., 24 (5). pp. 1139-1144.

Abstract

The Guidelines Challenge Conference on which this special issue builds asked as the first of its “further relevant questions”: “How do we incorporate more types of causally relevant information in guidelines?” This paper first supports the presupposition of this question—that we need further kinds of evidence—by pointing out that the randomized controlled trial, touted as the best source of evidence on effectiveness, can do so little for us. Second, it outlines a number of other good ways to learn what will work that the medical community, and much of the public health community, is not making much use of.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(1024Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12959
Publisher statement:This is the accepted version of the following article: Cartwright, N. (2018). What evidence should guidelines take note of? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(5): 1139-1144, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12959. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Date accepted:07 May 2018
Date deposited:08 May 2018
Date of first online publication:07 June 2018
Date first made open access:07 June 2019

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar