Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The fog of change: opacity and asperity in organizations

Hannan, M.T.; Pólos, L.; Carroll, G.R.

The fog of change: opacity and asperity in organizations Thumbnail


Authors

M.T. Hannan

G.R. Carroll



Abstract

Initial architectural change in organizations often induces other subsequent changes, generating lengthy cascades of changes in subordinate units. This article extends a formal model of cascading organizational change by examining the implications for organizational change of the limited foresight of those who initiate such change about unit interconnections (structural opacity) and the normative restrictiveness imposed on architectural features by organizational culture (cultural asperity). Opacity leads actors to underestimate the lengths of periods of reorganization and the associated costs of change, thereby prompting them unwittingly to undertake changes with adverse consequences. Increased opacity and asperity lengthen the total time that the organization spends reorganizing and the associated opportunity costs; and the expected effect of an architectural change on mortality hazards increases with the intricacy of the organizational design, structural opacity, and the asperity of organizational culture. We illustrate the theory with an interpretation of the 1995 collapse of Baring Brothers Bank.

Citation

Hannan, M., Pólos, L., & Carroll, G. (2003). The fog of change: opacity and asperity in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(3), 399-432. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556679

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date 2003-09
Deposit Date Aug 21, 2008
Publicly Available Date Aug 21, 2008
Journal Administrative Science Quarterly
Print ISSN 0001-8392
Publisher The Johnson School
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 48
Issue 3
Pages 399-432
DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/3556679
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1624991

Files

Published Journal Article (159 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Copyright of Administrative Science Quarterly is the property of Administrative Science Quarterly and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts).




You might also like



Downloadable Citations