Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Dung fungi as a proxy for megaherbivores: opportunities and limitations for archaeological applications

Perrotti, Angelina G.; van Asperen, Eline

Dung fungi as a proxy for megaherbivores: opportunities and limitations for archaeological applications Thumbnail


Authors

Angelina G. Perrotti

Eline van Asperen



Abstract

The use of spores of coprophilous fungi from sedimentary sequences as proxy evidence for large herbivore abundance has garnered pronounced attention and scrutiny over the past three decades. In response to the rapid rate at which new information is being discovered on this topic, this paper presents a brief review of the archaeological applications so far, and outlines opportunities and limitations of using Sporormiella as a proxy for herbivore abundance. Specific archaeological uses of this proxy include understanding megaherbivore extinctions and human land use patterns such as pastoralism and agriculture. We analyse how dung fungal records are formed and review the mycological literature to outline factors affecting spore reproduction and preservation. These include how strongly each commonly used dung fungal taxon relies on dung as a substrate and environmental factors affecting dung fungal reproduction and coprophilous fungi deposition. Certain laboratory preparation techniques adversely affect spore representation on pollen slides. The methods of analysis and quantification of spore records also impact our understanding. We describe good practice to increase precision of analytical methods. Due to limitations imposed by some of these factors, it is possible that an absence of dung fungi from a palaeoecological record does not imply an absence of herbivores. However, consideration of these factors and inclusion of as wide a range of coprophilous spore records as possible increases the reliability of such inferences.

Citation

Perrotti, A. G., & van Asperen, E. (2019). Dung fungi as a proxy for megaherbivores: opportunities and limitations for archaeological applications. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 28(1), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-018-0686-7

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 26, 2018
Online Publication Date Jun 6, 2018
Publication Date Jan 31, 2019
Deposit Date Jun 12, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jun 13, 2018
Journal Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
Print ISSN 0939-6314
Electronic ISSN 1617-6278
Publisher Springer
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 28
Issue 1
Pages 93-104
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-018-0686-7

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations