Professor Nancy Cartwright nancy.cartwright@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Contingency and the order of nature
Cartwright, N.
Authors
Contributors
P Harrison
Editor
I Hesketh
Editor
Abstract
Many profess faith in the universal rule of deterministic law. I urge remaining agnostic, putting into nature only what we need to account for what we know to be the case: order where, and to the extent that, we see it. Powers and mechanisms can do that job. Embracing contingency and deriving order from powers and mechanisms reduces three kinds of problems: ontological, theological, and epistemological. Ontologically, there is no puzzle about why models from various branches of natural and social science, daily life, and engineering serve us in good stead if all that's happening is physics laws playing themselves out. Also, when universal laws are replaced with a power/mechanism ontology, nothing is set irredeemably by the Big Bang or at some hyper-surface in space-time. What happens can depend on how we arrange things to exploit the powers of their parts. That may be put to significant theological advantage. The epistemological problem comes from philosopher of physics, Erhard Scheibe. Given what we take physics to teach about the universality of interaction, there is just one very large object – the entire universe – to be governed by laws of nature. How then do we ever learn those laws?
Citation
Cartwright, N. (2016). Contingency and the order of nature. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 58, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.12.008
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Jan 4, 2016 |
Publication Date | Aug 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jun 14, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 6, 2018 |
Journal | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences |
Print ISSN | 1369-8486 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 58 |
Pages | 56-63 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.12.008 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(623 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2016 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Objectivity and Intellectual Humility in Scientific Research: They’re Harder Than You Think
(2023)
Journal Article
A Philosopher Looks at Science
(2022)
Book
Rigour versus the need for evidential diversity
(2021)
Journal Article
Why Trust Science? Reliability, Particularity and the Tangle of Science
(2020)
Conference Proceeding
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search