Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Affect and ipsative approaches as a counter to pedagogic frailty : the guardian of traditional models of student success.

Rattray, J. (2018) 'Affect and ipsative approaches as a counter to pedagogic frailty : the guardian of traditional models of student success.', Higher education research and development., 37 (7). pp. 1489-1500.

Abstract

In this article, I consider how the neoliberal discourses surrounding higher education have resulted in an increasingly risk-averse culture of learning and teaching. Students are frequently reluctant to engage with troublesome or challenging knowledge and academics are less likely to push learners into contested spaces or deviate from accepted pedagogical practices for fear of upsetting them. The consequence of this situation is that we potentially have a generation of graduates who lack the resilience to cope in the graduate market. Drawing on the notion of pedagogic frailty, consideration is given to how models of success, that are associated with high stakes, single-point assessment, might limit the development of positive affect in learners. I argue instead for a reconsideration of notions of success building on the principles of ipsative assessment as a means of supporting the development of affective attributes, such as resilience, optimism and hope, in an effort to ensure graduates are equipped for an uncertain future.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(AM) Accepted Manuscript
Download PDF
(596Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1494141
Publisher statement:This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Higher Education Research and Development on 13 Jul 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/07294360.2018.1494141.
Date accepted:30 May 2018
Date deposited:19 July 2018
Date of first online publication:13 July 2018
Date first made open access:13 July 2019

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar