Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength.

Heit, E. and Feeney, A. (2005) 'Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength.', Psychonomic bulletin & review., 12 (2). pp. 340-344.

Abstract

According to the diversity principle, diverse evidence is strong evidence. There has been considerable evidence that people respect this principle in inductive reasoning. However, exceptions may be particularly informative. Medin, Coley, Storms, and Hayes (2003) introduced a relevance theory of inductive reasoning and used this theory to predict exceptions, including the nondiversity-by-property-reinforcement effect. A new experiment in which this phenomenon was investigated is reported here. Subjects made inductive strength judgments and similarity judgments for stimuli from Medin et al. (2003). The inductive strength judgments showed the same pattern as that in Medin et al. (2003); however, the similarity judgments suggested that the pattern should be interpreted as a diversity effect, rather than as a nondiversity effect. It is concluded that the evidence regarding the predicted nondiversity-by-property-reinforcement effect does not give distinctive support for relevance theory, although this theory does address other results.

Item Type:Article
Full text:PDF - Published Version (70Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:http://pbr.psychonomic-journals.org/content/12/2/340.abstract
Publisher statement:© Copyright 2005 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Record Created:11 Feb 2009
Last Modified:24 Nov 2010 10:50

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library