Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Otherwise, we'll assume you're OK to continue.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Presenting risk information : the effects of 'framing' and other manipulations on patient outcomes.

Edwards, A. and Elwyn, G. and Covey, J. and Matthews, E. and Pill, R. (2001) 'Presenting risk information : the effects of 'framing' and other manipulations on patient outcomes.', Journal of health communication., 6 (1). pp. 61-82.

Abstract

Discussing risks and benefits of treatments or care options is becoming an increas ingly important part of modern health care. This paper reviews the literature about manipulations of risk and benefit information in the clinical setting. There is a paucity of evidence in this field, particularly when examining specific manipulations. Only three categories of manipulation had three or more studies. The available evidence shows that the way information is presented can have significant effects on decisions made. The largest effects are evident when relative risk information is presented, as compared with absolute risk data. In addition, "loss framing" is more effective in influencing screening uptake behaviors than "gain framing" (odds ratio 1.18 [95% confidence interval 1.01-1.38]). There is also a pattern of evidence from studies comparing simpler with more complex information, more data with less, and those comparing numerical with verbal descriptions of risks. These studies suggest that providing more information, and which is more understandable to the patient, is associated with improved patient knowledge and a greater wariness to take treat ments or participate in trials. These findings can contribute to efforts to improve communication between professionals and patients.

Item Type:Article
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10810730150501413
Record Created:02 Apr 2007
Last Modified:20 Aug 2010 11:04

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Usage statisticsLook up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library