Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Kant on Christianity, Religion and Politics: Three Hopes, Three Limits

Insole, C.

Kant on Christianity, Religion and Politics: Three Hopes, Three Limits Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

This article makes two key claims in succession. First of all, Kant’s own religious hope is significantly and studiedly distanced from the traditions of Christianity that he would have received, in ways that have not yet been fully, or widely, appreciated. Kant makes an ideal moral community the object of our religious hopes, and not the transcendent God of the tradition. Secondly, Kant nonetheless has a notion of transcendence at play, but in a strikingly different key to traditional Christianity. Both concepts of transcendence, the Christian and the Kantian, deflate, in their own distinctive ways, our hopes for politics and history, in a way that can unsettle the certainties, and vanities, of both the traditional theologian and the secular Rawlsian. The Christian hope is not the same as Kant’s religious hope, which is distinct, in origin, depth and ambition from his more limited hope for politics.

Citation

Insole, C. (2016). Kant on Christianity, Religion and Politics: Three Hopes, Three Limits. Studies in Christian Ethics, 29(1), 14-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946815611111

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Oct 18, 2015
Publication Date Feb 28, 2016
Deposit Date Mar 15, 2016
Publicly Available Date Jan 30, 2019
Journal Studies in Christian Ethics
Print ISSN 0953-9468
Electronic ISSN 1745-5235
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 29
Issue 1
Pages 14-33
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946815611111

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations