Cookies

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.


Durham Research Online
You are in:

Linking direct measurements of turbidity currents to submarine canyon-floor deposits.

Maier, Katherine L. and Gales, Jennifer A. and Paull, Charles K. and Rosenberger, Kurt and Talling, Peter J. and Simmons, Stephen M. and Gwiazda, Roberto and McGann, Mary and Cartigny, Matthieu J. B. and Lundsten, Eve and Anderson, Krystle and Clare, Michael A. and Xu, Jingping and Parsons, Daniel and Barry, James P. and Wolfson-Schwehr, Monica and Nieminski, Nora M. and Sumner, Esther J. (2019) 'Linking direct measurements of turbidity currents to submarine canyon-floor deposits.', Frontiers in earth science., 7 . p. 144.

Abstract

Submarine canyons are conduits for episodic and powerful sediment density flows (commonly called turbidity currents) that move globally significant amounts of terrestrial sediment and organic carbon into the deep sea, forming some of the largest sedimentary deposits on Earth. The only record available for most turbidity currents is the deposit they leave behind. Therefore, to understand turbidity current processes, we need to determine the degree to which these flows are represented by their deposits. However, linking flows and deposits is a major long-standing scientific challenge. There are few detailed measurements from submarine turbidity currents in action, and even fewer direct measurements that can be compared to resulting seabed deposits. Recently, an extensive array of moorings along Monterey Canyon, offshore California, took measurements and samples during sediment density flow events, providing the most comprehensive dataset to date of turbidity current flows and their deposits. Here, we use sediment trap samples, velocity measurements, and seafloor cores to document how sand is transported through a submarine canyon, and how the transported sediment is represented in seafloor deposits. Sediment trap samples from events contain primarily fine to medium-grained sand with sharp bases, normal grading, and muddy tops. Sediment captured from the water column during the flow shows normal grading, which is broadly consistent with the initial peak and waning of flow velocities measured at a single height within the flow, and may be enhanced by collapsing flows. Flow events contain coarser sand concentrated toward the seafloor and larger grain sizes on the seafloor or in the dense near-bed layer, possibly representative of stratified flows. Although flow velocity varies, sand grain sizes in sediment traps are similar over distances of 50 km down-canyon, suggesting that grain size is an unfaithful record of down-canyon changes in maximum flow speeds. Sand transported within flow events and sampled in sediment traps is similar to sand sampled from the seafloor shortly after the events, but traps do not contain pebbles and gravel common in seabed deposits. Seabed deposits thus appear to faithfully record the sand component that is transported in the water column during sub-annual turbidity currents.

Item Type:Article
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution.
Download PDF
(8980Kb)
Full text:(VoR) Version of Record
Available under License - Creative Commons Attribution.
Download PDF (Advance Online Version)
(8872Kb)
Status:Peer-reviewed
Publisher Web site:https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00144
Publisher statement:© 2019 Maier, Gales, Paull, Rosenberger, Talling, Simmons, Gwiazda, McGann, Cartigny, Lundsten, Anderson, Clare, Xu, Parsons, Barry, Wolfson-Schwehr, Nieminski and Sumner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Date accepted:20 May 2019
Date deposited:13 June 2019
Date of first online publication:06 June 2019
Date first made open access:No date available

Save or Share this output

Export:
Export
Look up in GoogleScholar