Thorpe, A. and Craig, R. and Hadikin, G. and Batistic, S. (2018) 'Semantic tone of research 'environment' submissions in the UK's Research Evaluation Framework 2014.', Research evaluation., 27 (2). pp. 53-62.
This article applies DICTION computer-assisted text analysis software to evaluate the tone of research ‘Environment’ submissions by Business and Management Studies schools in the UK’s 2014 Research Evaluation Framework. We find that submissions contain distinctive differences in semantic tone between high-ranked and low-ranked universities, particularly in terms of DICTION’s master variable, ACTIVITY. The language of high-ranked institutions has a tone of low ACTIVITY, whereas the language of low-ranked institutions has a tone of high ACTIVITY. More adjectives are used than expected: by high-ranked universities to bolster strong public reputations, and by low-ranked universities to atone for weaknesses. High-ranked universities are advantaged because they are more likely to be represented on assessing panels and be better-attuned to reader expectations. The results suggest that low-ranked universities could have achieved higher scores by reflecting on particular areas of word choice and the potential effects of those choices on assessors.
|Full text:||(AM) Accepted Manuscript|
Download PDF (1139Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx039|
|Publisher statement:||This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Research evaluation following peer review. The version of record Thorpe, A., Craig, R., Hadikin, G. & Batistic, S. (2018). Semantic tone of research 'environment' submissions in the UK's Research Evaluation Framework 2014. Research Evaluation 27(2): 53-62 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx039|
|Record Created:||04 Jul 2019 10:43|
|Last Modified:||13 Dec 2019 00:30|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|