Delibaş, Okan and Moritz, Robert and Selby, David and Göç, Deniz and Revan, Mustafa Kemal (2019) 'Multiple porphyry cu-mo events in the Eastern Pontides metallogenic belt, Turkey : from early cretaceous subduction to Eocene postcollision evolution.', Economic geology., 114 (7). pp. 1285-1300.
Four porphyry Cu-Mo systems were investigated by Re-Os molybdenite geochronology to constrain their timing with respect to the geodynamic and magmatic evolution of the eastern Pontides, Turkey. Molybdenite from the Ispir-Ulutaş deposit yielded an Re-Os age of 131.0 ± 0.7 Ma, which is consistent with Early Cretaceous U-Pb laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) zircon ages of local calc-alkaline intrusions. It demonstrates that porphyry deposits were already formed during Early Cretaceous subduction of the Neotethys along the eastern Pontides, and that they can be correlated with porphyry Cu events in the adjacent Lesser Caucasus. Molybdenite Re-Os ages of 76.0 ± 0.4 and 75.7 ± 0.4 Ma at the Elbeyli prospect and 77.2 ± 1.0 Ma at the Emeksen prospect overlap with U-Pb LA-ICP-MS zircon ages of shoshonitic to high-K calc-alkaline intrusions in the region, which were emplaced during Late Cretaceous Neotethys subduction. A 50.7 ± 0.3 Ma molybdenite Re-Os age at the Güzelyayla deposit confirms porphyry Cu-Mo emplacement coeval with Eocene postcollisional, calc-alkaline adakitic magmatism of the eastern Pontides. An electron microprobe study of molybdenite samples, supplemented by data obtained during Re-Os dating, shows that the Eocene Güzelyayla deposit and the Late Cretaceous Emeksen prospect have the highest Re enrichment. Postcollisional melting of a thickened mafic lower continental crust and melting of a metasomatized lithospheric mantle with little to no interaction with upper crustal rocks may explain the Re enrichment at Güzelyayla and Emeksen, respectively.
|Full text:||Publisher-imposed embargo until 01 November 2020. |
(AM) Accepted Manuscript
File format - PDF (5439Kb)
|Publisher Web site:||https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.4663|
|Date accepted:||01 March 2019|
|Date deposited:||09 July 2019|
|Date of first online publication:||02 July 2019|
|Date first made open access:||01 November 2020|
Save or Share this output
|Look up in GoogleScholar|