Smith, B. W. (2001) 'Possible worlds and moral philosophy.', Teorema., 20 (3). pp. 41-50.
This paper is, in part, a response to Steffen Borge's article in Teorema Vol. XIX/1 (2000), "A Call for a Possible World Argument in Ethics". I suggest that the relationship between possible worlds and ethical deliberation is not distinctive and auxiliary in nature. Rather, I argue that the contemplation of possible worlds is an essential part of ethical theorizing. The immediate character of ethics vis-a-vis the possible is evidenced by the account of moral deliberation proposed by a certain form of moral particularism. In particular, the work of John McDowell demonstrates the inextricably modal aspects of ethics in this regard.
|Keywords:||Ethics, Modality, Particularism, Possible-World, McDowell.|
|Full text:||Full text not available from this repository.|
|Publisher Web site:||http://www.uniovi.es/Teorema/English/Issues/XX3.html|
|Record Created:||10 Apr 2007|
|Last Modified:||08 Apr 2009 16:29|
|Social bookmarking:||Export: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex|
|Usage statistics||Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library|