We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse this repository, you give consent for essential cookies to be used. You can read more about our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Durham Research Online
You are in:

‘Seeing is believing’ and ‘believing is seeing’.

Schellekens, E. (2005) '‘Seeing is believing’ and ‘believing is seeing’.', Acta analytica., 20 (4). pp. 10-23.


The principal concern of my paper is a distinction between two ways of appreciating works of art, characterised here in terms of the phrases ‘seeing is believing’ and ‘believing is seeing’. I examine this distinction in the light of an epistemological requirement at times at least grounded in what David Davies, in his Art as Performance, refers to as the ‘common sense theory of art appreciation’ in order to assess exactly what aspect of the philosophical approach generally known as aesthetic empiricism his account commits him to reject. I argue that the ‘experiential requirement’, if only conceived in a slightly broader way than is usual, might very well have an important role to play not only in the appropriate appreciation of works that do not demonstrate the need for such a requirement (primarily works of late modern and conceptual art), but also in the ontological account Davies himself favours.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Experiential requirement, Aesthetic/artistic properties, ‘idea idea’, Perceptual/experiential imagination.
Full text:Full text not available from this repository.
Publisher Web site:
Record Created:11 Apr 2007
Last Modified:08 Sep 2016 12:01

Social bookmarking: del.icio.usConnoteaBibSonomyCiteULikeFacebookTwitterExport: EndNote, Zotero | BibTex
Look up in GoogleScholar | Find in a UK Library