Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Bureaucracy and the balanced scorecard in health care settings

Craig, R.; Oliveira, H.; Rodrigues, L.L.

Bureaucracy and the balanced scorecard in health care settings Thumbnail


Authors

H. Oliveira

L.L. Rodrigues



Abstract

Purpose: We explore the relationship between the balanced scorecard (BSC) and neo-bureaucracy by investigating whether the operationalization of the BSC incorporates “neo-bureaucratic” ideas and whether the BSC implemented in a Portuguese Local Health Unit (LHU) demonstrates a neo-bureaucratic approach. Design/methodology/approach: We conduct semi-structured interviews with LHU staff and analyse documents to assess whether features of bureaucratic organization were evident in the use of a BSC by the LHU. Findings: We found nine bureaucratic features evident in the LHU's BSC. These were systematization, rationality, authority, jurisdiction, professional qualification, knowledge, discipline, transparency and accountability. The BSC used at the LHU demonstrated a neo-bureaucratic approach. Originality/value: Our study helps to demystify bureaucracy and overcome prevailing prejudices regarding some of its principles. Health care managers should recognize and endorse neo-bureaucratic principles in developing a BSC. They should recognize the BSC as involving a neo-bureaucratic approach. The BSC is a valuable management tool that hospital managers should find useful in fostering flexibility, collaboration, innovation and adaptation – all of which should help lead to improved healthcare outcomes.

Citation

Craig, R., Oliveira, H., & Rodrigues, L. (2020). Bureaucracy and the balanced scorecard in health care settings. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 33(3), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-07-2019-0121

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 18, 2020
Online Publication Date Apr 6, 2020
Publication Date 2020
Deposit Date Feb 20, 2020
Publicly Available Date Apr 22, 2020
Journal International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
Print ISSN 0952-6862
Publisher Emerald
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 33
Issue 3
Pages 247-259
DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-07-2019-0121
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1276702

Files

Accepted Journal Article (433 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This article is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial International Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) and any reuse must be in accordance with the terms outlined by the licence.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations